• *These fields are required.

    Powered by Salesforce CRM
Month: May, 2010

There’s Fake Food In Your Diet! Yikes!!

Various fruits, vegetables, nuts, and grains; ...
Image via Wikipedia

Do you eat “real” food or “fake” food?  Do you know the difference?  Fake food is processed, has lots of chemicals and additives and doesn’t resemble anything you find in nature.  In fact, if you read the ingredient list, you can’t even pronounce some of the ingredients!  Not many Americans eat “real” foods the majority of the time, but it is so important to your overall health and longevity.  I’m not saying you need to go cold-turkey and change your eating habits over night, but making gradual changes can really make a big difference in the long run.  You might also discover that you really enjoy the “real” foods more than you thought!

Check out this article from the Washington Post (they do a great weekly report called Lean and Fit).  www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/24/AR2010052402854.html?wpisrc=nl_health

Parting ways with “fake” food
 
By Jennifer LaRue Huget
Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Packaged guacamole makes the cut.

Pop Tarts, alas, do not.

The difference? The first is “real” food, the second not so much.

That’s according to Bruce Weinstein and Mark Scarbrough, whose new book, “Real Food Has Curves: How to Get Off Processed Food, Lose Weight, and Love What You Eat” (Gallery), is a guide to what should be a natural, intuitive activity: feeding ourselves.

Connecticut couple Weinstein (a trained chef) and Scarbrough (a former English professor) have written 17 cookbooks together over 11 years and write for Weight Watchers, Cooking Light and, on occasion, The Washington Post. (Weinstein is also known for his book and blog about knitting for men.)

In “Real Food,” they walk us through a seven-step process of weaning ourselves from packaged and processed foods, starting by selecting and tasting — really tasting — a fresh peach and ending with committing to “treat yourself well” by bettering your breakfast, enjoying midday snacks and relishing dessert.

Along the way, readers learn to view foods in terms of how close they are to “real.” In the authors’ paradigm, freshly squeezed orange juice is “real,” orange juice not made from concentrate “almost real,” orange juice from concentrate “barely real” and bottled orange-flavored drink “not real.”

Wherever your typical diet falls in this range, the authors suggest you “take one step to the left,” closer to the “real” end. “As you go about your day,” they write, “think about what’s real and what’s not, what’s almost real food and what’s barely so, what’s been shellacked with additives, what’s wonderful in its natural state.”

Eating in this fashion will probably help you lose weight, say the authors, who both shed pounds when they shifted toward “real” food. But it will also make your diet more healthful and satisfying, they promise.

Grocery shopping with the couple, as I got to do last week, is an exercise in discretion and label reading. Just back from a business trip, they needed to restock their larder. Scarbrough assured Weinstein that they still had plenty of homemade granola; what they needed were ingredients to make the week’s lineup of vegetable-and-grain-based lunch salads, which include wheat berries, quinoa, roasted corn and red peppers, baby artichokes, cucumbers and celery. (You can find recipes on their blog: http://www.realfoodhascurves.com.)

The two are wary of ingredients such as “flavoring” and “spices,” which really don’t pin down what you’re putting in your mouth. They nixed bottled coleslaw dressing (whose first ingredient is sugar) but approved of pre-sliced, packaged purple onions in the refrigerator section. If you use those onions, Weinstein says, “you are cooking; you’re just not chopping.”

Tofu makes the grade, but not tofu-based vegetarian chorizo sausage. If your dietary restrictions preclude your eating a certain food, Scarbrough suggests, “don’t get something fake instead.” If you’re gluten intolerant and can’t eat a pizza, he says, better to forgo “fake,” wheat-free pizza crusts and opt instead for a plate of nachos with (“real”) melted cheese.

Weinstein bakes bread at home, but for convenience’s sake he buys store-baked bialies. That’s in keeping with Scarbrough’s advice that “convenience shouldn’t be discounted, just examined.”

As for the common wisdom that the most healthful food lies along the grocery store’s perimeter, Scarbrough asserts that some approved foods can be found among the boxes, bags and cans in the center aisles. Shelf-stable vacuum boxes of milk pass muster, for instance, as do some canned tomatoes and rice.

Still, the grocery shelves are stacked against those seeking “real” food. In the syrup aisle, Scarbrough pointed out that the only “real” sweeteners there, the honey and real maple syrup, are on the top shelf, out of reach. And they are more expensive than the front-and-center pancake toppers whose first ingredients are corn syrup and high fructose corn syrup, with not a drop of maple in the mix.

As we left the store, Scarbrough mentioned that he and Weinstein “almost called the book ‘Chocolate Pudding Will Save Your Life.’ ” To these two, the difference between pudding made at home with a few simple ingredients and the additive-riddled kind in boxes or tubs is emblematic of their approach.

“If you have ‘real’ chocolate pudding,” Weinstein says, “it will change the way you think about everything.”

 I’m thinking about that “real” chocolate pudding right now!  Probably not a good idea to write a blog about food at lunch time when I haven’t eaten yet.  On the upside, it has made me hungry for some “real” food, not the fake stuff.

Posted by Laurie Puckett, Remmel Wellness Center – a full service chiropractic and wellness facility in St. Petersburg, Florida.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Instant Recess: The Best Part of the Work Day

Sports and games
Image via Wikipedia

My youngest daughter just graduated from the 8th grade, which means that both my kids are in high school now.  So I was looking at pictures of them when they were young and reminiscing about kindergarten, and that got me thinking about my childhood.  What was your favorite part of school when you were a kid?  I bet you said recess.  I know I did!!!  (Well, actually recess and show-and-tell come in at a tie for me.)  Ever wonder why you don’t get recess any more?  Well, you should and you can! 

Recess is being added into corporate culture as a way to improve productivity, improve health and fitness and develop comraderie.  I really want to go out in the parking lot and play kickball!!!  Who’s in? … And I don’t want to hear anyone complain about how hot it is outside! :-)  

Read this article from the Washington Post to see how one office has incorporated recess into their work day:

At precisely 1:05 p.m., Stacey Thompson announced, “Okay. It’s time!” Within seconds, a dozen co-workers in her downtown Washington office had gathered by the reception desk to march in place, roll their shoulders and prepare to dance.

The employees of Summit Health Institute for Research and Education (SHIRE), a nonprofit organization that fights obesity, are fittingly among the first in the city to embrace Instant Recess, a nationwide push to establish a daily 10-minute exercise break. Think coffee break or cigarette break, but good for you.

“This is hard for folks to ignore. You can’t say, ‘I didn’t know it was happening.’ And if your boss has time to do it, so do you,” said SHIRE’s executive director, Ruth Perot, who removed her purple blazer to participate (but kept her pearls on).

Vigorous moves such as lifting your arms and kicking your legs back elevate the heart rate, but the routines are accessible to everyone, from the 20-something interns to 79-year-old senior project associate Canary Girardeau. Even a woman who wandered into the office to ask a question joined in for a minute.

There’s no doubt this ritual looks weird — just ask the delivery guy who stood outside the office window snickering. But it shouldn’t. And it won’t, predicts UCLA professor Toni Yancey, who created Instant Recess and has a forthcoming book on the topic. “In five years, Instant Recess will be in Congress, churches, waiting rooms,” she says. “Once the opportunity is available, people will take it.”

It’s about to become more available, as Instant Recess is the calling card for the new National Physical Activity Plan. Announced this month by a coalition of 20 partners from the public and private sectors, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, YMCA and AARP, the plan aims to change our national culture to make exercise part of everyone’s lives. The strategies include encouraging programs at workplaces and schools, making physical activity a “vital sign” that doctors discuss with patients, and integrating activity into transportation plans by prioritizing sidewalks, bike lanes and trails.

“There’s no single action that can solve this problem,” says the University of South Carolina’s Russell Pate, chairman of the plan. For too long, experts have clung to the idea that if you tell people they need to exercise, they will. But when many of them hear recommendations that they should be active for an hour a day or walk 10,000 steps, they get overwhelmed. “We’ve learned the hard way that giving people advice and encouragement isn’t getting it done,” he says.

So instead of targeting individuals, the plan is going after society. As Shellie Pfohl, the newly named executive director of the President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports, puts it: “We’ve engineered exercise out of our daily lives. Now we have to engineer it back in.”

That means little changes, such as keeping stairwells well lit — and maybe having some inspiring music pumped in — to make climbing more attractive than riding the elevator. It also means bigger changes, such as making neighborhoods safer so people don’t feel as though they’re in danger if they take a stroll outside.

Ensuring that the wonders of the outdoors are readily available to everyone is particularly important to National Recreation and Park Association chief executive Barbara Tulipane, who’s also on board with the plan.

“I’m excited to get people to understand that it’s not that hard. You don’t have to wear a heart rate monitor,” she says. “It’s as simple as taking a walk in the park.” (And getting more funding for park and recreation programs.)

What also makes the plan stand out is that it’s not just kids’ stuff. Most of the attention these days has been focused on childhood obesity, and while that’s a critical concern, people of all ages have grown too sedentary. So it’s vital to let adults know that they’re not a lost cause, especially because they’re the ones who can shape society — and a whole lot of bodies while they’re at it.

I suggest they start with an Instant Recess.  Yes, I do!  And I am going to push to incorporate it into our office as well.  Patients can join us if they happen to walk in while we are engaged in Instant Recess.  Why not?  After all, they walk in and join our staff meetings!  And if you see an impromptu kickball game taking place in our parking lot, now you know why!

Posted by Laurie Puckett, Remmel Wellness Center, a full service chiropractic and wellness facility in St. Petersburg, Florida.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Swim Lessons for Young Children OK

Fun at a waterpark in a wave pool
Image via Wikipedia

With the Memorial Day weekend upon us, it is officially pool season.  Public pools and water parks around the country will be reopening.  In warmer climates, like here in Florida, it has been pool season for more than a month.  All the more reason to encourage pool safety for all ages, but for our little ones in particular.  The good news is that the American Academy of Pediatrics as finally agreed that swim lessons are OK for children as young as one.

Check out this article that I found on Bay News 9:

The nation’s largest pediatricians group is relaxing its stance against swimming lessons for children younger than 4.

In the past, the American Academy of Pediatrics has said swim classes might give toddlers and parents a false sense of security. Now the group says it’s fine to enroll children as young as 1.

A few small studies suggest toddlers may be less likely to drown if they’ve had swim lessons. The doctors aren’t recommending lessons for every young child. Some parents may feel their little ones aren’t ready and that’s OK.

Parents should choose classes that emphasize water safety and require a parent or other adult to be in the water with the child, said Connie Harvey who heads aquatics development for the American Red Cross and wasn’t involved in the doctors’ policy update.

Classes should have at least one instructor for every 10 students, she said.

The updated policy, released online Monday by the journal Pediatrics, also recommends fences around all pools, even popular inflatable ones. Kids can drown by leaning over the soft sides and falling in.

And the group warns that children can drown when their hair or hands get sucked into the drains of pools or spas without drain covers or proper filter-pump equipment.

The rate of childhood drowning deaths has declined in recent years. About 1,100 U.S. children drowned in 2006.

Parents know they should be vigilant while children swim, but trouble can occur in an instant of inattention, said Dr. Jeffrey Weiss of Phoenix Children’s Hospital and lead author of the policy.

“It’s not a lack of supervision, it’s a lapse of supervision,” Weiss said.

We concur.  Swim lessons are very important, but they should never be a substitute for vigilant supervision.  Have fun, enjoy the water, and be safe!

Posted by Laurie Puckett, Remmel Wellness Center, a full service chiropractic and wellness facility in St. Petersburg, Florida.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Statins vs. Nuts in the Battle to Prevent Heart Attacks, Strokes

HDL
Image via Wikipedia

I’m going to avoid providing my view and slanting the tone of this post.  I want you to read and decide for yourself the best way for you personally to lower your risk of heart attack or stroke:

At the end of March, the New York Times reported that with the FDA’s blessing, a drug giant is about to expand the market for its blockbuster cholesterol medication Crestor to a new category of customers: as a preventive measure for millions of people who do not have cholesterol problems.

Some medical experts question whether this is a healthy move.

They point to mounting concern that cholesterol medications — known as statins and already the most widely prescribed drugs in the United States — may not be as safe a preventive medicine as previously believed for people who are at low risk of heart attacks or strokes.

Statins have been credited with saving thousands of lives every year with relatively few side effects, and some medical experts endorse the drug’s broader use. But for healthy people who would take statins largely as prevention — which would be the case for the new category of Crestor patients — other experts suggest the benefits may not outweigh any side effects.

Among the risks raising new concerns, recently published evidence indicates that statins could raise a person’s risk of developing Type 2 diabetes by 9 percent.

“It’s a good thing to be skeptical about whether there may be long-term harm from healthy people taking a drug like this,” said Dr. Mark A. Hlatky, a professor of health research and cardiovascular medicine at the Stanford University medical school.

If you are at low risk, but do have some risk factors, do you take the statin or look for an alternative?  Your alternative comes from the Food Consumer: If you don’t want to take statins to lower your cholesterol, eat lots of nuts!

Eating a lot of nuts may help lower cholesterol and improve your heart health, a new study by Dr. Joan Sabate of Loma Linda University in California suggests.

Greater benefits were found particularly in those who were thin, ate less healthful diets, and those with high levels of bad cholesterol and blood fats, the researchers reported.

They found eating an average intake of 67 grams or 2.4 ounces of nuts each day cut the subjects’ total cholesterol by about 5 percent, reduced LDL (bad) cholesterol by 7 percent and improved the ratio of total cholesterol or LDL cholesterol to good HDL cholesterol.

The observations make sense, according to the researchers, because nuts contain healthy substances such as good fats, fiber and antioxidants among other things.

Even though nuts were found associated with 21 percent lower triglycerides in people with high blood fats, they had no effect on triglycerdies in subjects with normal levels.

The researchers further found the benefits were more significant in people who had high bad cholesterol, or lower body weight, or ate more Western diets.

The study was published in May 2010 in Archives of Internal Medicine and reported in the Food Consumer.

The choice is yours – take a pill that is associated with an increased risk of diabetes, or eat a small amount of nuts each day.

Posted by Laurie Puckett, Remmel Wellness Center, a full service chiropractic and wellness facility in St. Petersburg, Florida.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

CDC Tracking How Environment Impacts Health

Data Source http://www.irdes.fr/EcoSante/DownL...
Image via Wikipedia

This is really cool.  The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is tracking the impact that different environmental factors have on a population’s health.  This is referred to as environmental health, and for the CDC’s purposes, it is defined as how the environment might affect a person’s health and how people might affect the health of the environment.

Measuring amounts of hazardous substances in our environment in a standard way, tracing the spread of these over time and area, seeing how they show up in human tissues, and understanding how they may cause illness is critical. The National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network is the start of that system.

The environment is our air, our water, our food, and our surroundings.  Tracking describes how the CDC collects data, interprets it, and reports it. They are acquiring data about hazards in the environment, if a person was exposed to one of them, and health problems that may be related to these exposures.

The National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network is a system of integrated health, exposure, and hazard information and data from a variety of national, state, and city sources. On the Tracking Network, you can explore information and view maps, tables, and charts about health and environment across the country.  Check it out at http://ephtracking.cdc.gov/showHome.action.

The data collected is still being developed and studied.  The CDC expects to issue its first report of the compiled data some time this year, so stay tuned.  In the mean time, you can reduce your risk from exposure to environmental hazards by regularly undergoing a body detoxification program to rid your body of these hazards.  There are many different types of detox programs, but at the Remmel Wellness Center we use the ion foot bath to remove toxins from the body.  These hazards build up and act cumulatively, so please discuss a detox program with your health care provider or with Dr. Remmel.

Posted by Laurie Puckett, Remmel Wellness Center, a full service chiropractic and wellness facility in St. Petersburg, Florida.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Two Things the Middle Aged Woman Should Know About Exercise

A complete weight training workout can be perf...
Image via Wikipedia

                             
Don’t you just hate the middle-aged woman who is the same size she was in high school?  I know I do!  But this woman is an anomaly.  There are very, very few people who have not gained weight as they have aged, and I am no exception.  There have been tons of studies that discuss how much you should exercise and what types of exercise you should engage in to lose weight, but what if you just don’t want to gain any?  How much do you need to exercise to maintain your weight?

Researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health found that an hour of moderate activity a day — including such recreational activities as brisk walking, leisurely bicycling, ballroom dancing and playing with children — prevented women of normal weight from gaining more than five pounds over any three-year period. Half that amount of vigorous activity, like running, jogging or fast biking, will do the trick as well, they said.

I agree with the rearcher’s conclusion that it is so hard to lose weight and maintain the loss that whatever weight you are at, maintaining your current weight is a success. 

But if you want to burn fat and lose weight, you will need to incorporate strength training activities into your exercise routine.   I hear so many women shy away from strength training because they are afraid lifting weights will cause them to look like Rambo.  So that is the next topic:  Will lifting weights make your muscles big and bulky?

Not necessarily.   Conventional wisdom holds that lifting heavy weights makes you big and bulky, which is the reason many women (and some men) who want slim and “toned” physiques opt for lighter weights with more reps.

But the notion is not supported by science. Producing bulky muscles requires not just heavy weights but heavy calorie consumption as well, typically far above the 2,000 daily calories recommended for many adults. 

For people who lift weights to tone up and slim down, experts say, a regimen that includes a combination of challenging weights and fewer repetitions can help significantly. In a 2002 study, for example, scientists looked at what happened when women performed various resistance exercises at different weights and repetitions (85 percent of their maximum ability for 8 reps, versus 45 percent for 15). Subjects lifting more weight fewer times burned more energy and had a greater metabolic boost after exercise. 

In another study published last year, scientists followed 122 women for six years. They found that those who were assigned to do resistance exercises three times a week — sets of 8 reps at 70 to 80 percent of their ability — lost the most weight and body fat. A similar two-year study of women who did strength training with challenging weight twice weekly found similar effects on body and “intra-abdominal” fat.

That’s great news, because that is exactly the result we are looking for when it comes to burning fat, slimming down and toning our bodies.  Time to hit the gym or pick up the resistance bands in your living room and start strengthening and toning!

Posted by Laurie Puckett, Remmel Wellness Center, a full service chiropractic and wellness facility in St. Petersburg, Florida.  Information obtained from articles in the New York Times.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

ADD Caused by Eating Fruits and Vegetables

Organic vegetables at a farmers' market in Arg...
Image via Wikipedia

We’ve all heard the saying “you are what you eat,” and today that still holds true, but in a kind of scary way.  There is mounting evidence that pesticides are a major contributing factor in the presence of ADHD in children.  When we eat fruits and veggies, we are consuming toxins.  Those toxins build up and impact the brain, internal organs and central nervous system. 

When it manifests as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, or ADHD, the solution is often to limit sugars (always a good idea) and add medication.  Unfortunately, this results in even more toxins being absorbed by the little body – in the form of more fruits and vegetables, and from prescription medications.

For anyone who has been diagnosed with ADD or ADHD, a good detoxification program is the key to good health.  We incorporate the ion foot bath detoxification system into our patients’ regimen, and have had great success with detoxifying children.

Here is the text from the article I found on Bay News 9:

A new analysis of U.S. health data links children’s attention-deficit disorder with exposure to common pesticides used on fruits and vegetables.

While the study couldn’t prove that pesticides used in agriculture contribute to childhood learning problems, experts said the research is persuasive.

“I would take it quite seriously,” said Virginia Rauh of Columbia University, who has studied prenatal exposure to pesticides and wasn’t involved in the new study.

More research will be needed to confirm the tie, she said.

Children may be especially prone to the health risks of pesticides because they’re still growing and they may consume more pesticide residue than adults relative to their body weight.

In the body, pesticides break down into compounds that can be measured in urine. Almost universally, the study found detectable levels: The compounds turned up in the urine of 94 percent of the children.

The kids with higher levels had increased chances of having ADHD, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, a common problem that causes students to have trouble in school. The findings were published Monday in Pediatrics.

The children may have eaten food treated with pesticides, breathed it in the air or swallowed it in their drinking water. The study didn’t determine how they were exposed. Experts said it’s likely children who don’t live near farms are exposed through what they eat.

“Exposure is practically ubiquitous. We’re all exposed,” said lead author Maryse Bouchard of the University of Montreal.

She said people can limit their exposure by eating organic produce. Frozen blueberries, strawberries and celery had more pesticide residue than other foods in one government report.

A 2008 Emory University study found that in children who switched to organically grown fruits and vegetables, urine levels of pesticide compounds dropped to undetectable or close to undetectable levels.

Because of known dangers of pesticides in humans, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency limits how much residue can stay on food. But the new study shows it’s possible even tiny, allowable amounts of pesticide may affect brain chemistry, Rauh said.

The exact causes behind the children’s reported ADHD though are unclear. Any number of factors could have caused the symptoms and the link with pesticides could be by chance.

The new findings are based on one-time urine samples in 1,139 children and interviews with their parents to determine which children had ADHD. The children, ages 8 to 15, took part in a government health survey in 2000-2004.

As reported by their parents, about 150 children in the study either showed the severe inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity characteristic of ADHD, or were taking drugs to treat it.

The study dealt with one common type of pesticide called organophosphates. Levels of six pesticide compounds were measured. For the most frequent compound detected, 20 percent of the children with above-average levels had ADHD. In children with no detectable amount in their urine, 10 percent had ADHD.

“This is a well conducted study,” said Dr. Lynn Goldman of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and a former EPA administrator.

Relying on one urine sample for each child, instead of multiple samples over time, wasn’t ideal, Goldman said.

The study provides more evidence that the government should encourage farmers to switch to organic methods, said Margaret Reeves, senior scientist with the Pesticide Action Network, an advocacy group that’s been working to end the use of many pesticides.

“It’s unpardonable to allow this exposure to continue,” Reeves said.

We agree.  If you don’t grow your own food, it is really hard to avoid toxins in your food sources.  That makes a detox program all the more important to addressing health concerns such as ADD/ADHD as well as for prevention.  Please contact your healthcare provider or Dr. Remmel at Remmel Wellness Center for more information on what you can do to eliminate toxins from your system.

Posted by Laurie Puckett, Remmel Wellness Center, a full service chiropractic and wellness facility in St. Petersburg, Florida.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

The DIY Guide to Taking 12 Years Off Your Life

How-To Guide:  How to age yourself 12 years … 

All you have to do is combine these four common bad habits — smoking, drinking too much, inactivity and poor diet — and you too can age an additional 12 years!

This was discovered by tracking almost 5,000 Brits.  I bet they could have found more than 5,000, and I’m positive they could do this study in the US — no problem!  These findings highlight one more reason to adopt a healthier lifestyle ~ unless you are 9 and trying to get a fake ID.

Not everyone partook in all 4 bad habits, but for those who did, 29% of them died during the study. The most common causes of death included heart disease and cancer, both related to unhealthy lifestyles.

 The study also include people who had no “bad habits” (you know; boring people – lol) and only 8% of them died during the course of the study. 

You might think that you don’t really have any “bad” habits, but the way the study defined them might make you stop and think.  The aging behaviors were: smoking tobacco; indulging in more than three alcoholic drinks per day for men and more than two daily for women; getting less than two hours of physical activity per week; and eating fruits and vegetables fewer than three times daily.

When you combine all these risky behaviors, the risk of death increased substantially and made people who engaged in them seem 12 years older than people in the healthiest group. 

The good news is that you don’t need to be fanatical to be in the healthy category.  These behaviors add up and are cummulative, so it should be possible for most people to manage to do it.

For example, a side salad, one apple and a glass of  juice (not fruit punch) would suffice for the fruit and vegetable cutoffs in the study.  The amounts are pretty modest and less strict than many guidelines.  Compare this to the USDA recommendations of at least 4 cups of fruits or vegetables daily for adults, depending on age and activity level; and about 2½ hours of exercise weekly.

Eating healthfuly, exercising, drinking in moderation and no smoking combine to create an Anti-aging lifestyle, and isn’t that what we all want? 

Posted by Laurie Puckett, Remmel Wellness Center, a full service chiropractic and wellness facility in St. Petersburg, Florida. 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

True stories from the ER

Cast of the 15th and final season (2008-2009)
Image via Wikipedia

Ok.  This post is supposed to be interactive and entertaining, and it requires audience participation.  So here is how it goes:  There is a searchable database that contains 2 million emergency room visits.  Your task is to search and find amusing, odd or entertaining entries and share them with us. 

Remember the game “Don’t Spill The Beans?”  So do I, and as I found out from searching this database, so will a lot of other parents, who like me took a young child to the ER for shoving a plastic bean up their nose!  Huh.  And all along I thought my kid was being original! 

What else did I find?  Check these out, and then find others on your own!

Age       Sex      Body Part        Injury Type                      Extent of Injury

27        Male    Leg, lower       Foreign body Male        Pt playing w/friend when sustained BB/Pellet from air rifle on Thanksgiving.  Thought it would come out on its own.    This guy needs new friends …

51         Male    Leg                    lower Strain or sprain    Kicked wooden door, calf ms pain immediately ms strain.   Temper, temper …

17         Male    Finger              Laceration                          Pt. stuck hand in blender, sust’d 2.5cm avuls. lac. of 4th digit.  Potential for the Darwin Awards …

 40       Female Ankle              Strain or sprain                Ankle strain – 40 yof c/o bilateral ankle pain after wearing high-heeled shoes to a court date.  I wonder what she was in court for???

28        Male      Knee               Dislocation                         Got hurt getting out of bed. DX knee dislocation birth date is correct.  Paul Harvey must be wondering what the REST of the story is …

18       Male      Head               Laceration                           Pt just had sex when he went to take his condom off he saw it was bloody which made him pass out striking head on the floor, laceration scalp.  At least he was practicing safe sex….

Now it’s your turn.  Go to http://www2.tbo.com/static/news-special-reports-data-bay/tbo-special-reports-cpsc-injury-reports/

Posted by Laurie Puckett, Remmel Wellness Center, a full service chiropractic and wellness facility in St. Petersburg, Florida.
 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Prevention is the Best Medicine

tropical fruit world
Image by mralan via Flickr

I don’t know about you, but I wasn’t really surprised when the AP reported that the cost of treating cancer has almost doubled in the past two decades. 

Americans (and their insurance companies) spend a ridiculous amount of money each year on cancer treatment.  The numbers are reported by the AP state that the total cost of cancer treatments rose from nearly $25 billion in 1987 to more than $48 billion by the end of 2005.   I doubt that these numbers have been adjusted for inflation, but whether they have or they haven’t — WOW!  That is a LOT  of money! 

Sometimes you can do everything right, and you still get cancer.  But for the vast majority of us, there are things we can do to reduce our risk of being diagnosed with cancer.  Take a look at the foods you eat, the beverages you drink, the air you breathe, your exercise levels, your nutritional intake, your environment – and then talk to a healthcare practitioner about what you can do to reduce your risk factors. 

We strongly encourge a body detoxification program to remove toxins and heavy metals from your system.  A detox program will help you boost your immune system because your body won’t be busy fighting toxins and will be better prepared to fight disease.  Many illnesses and diseases can also be tied directly to toxins in your system.  Get rid of the toxins, and your health improves.  Get more info on the body detoxification system we use in our office and what it can do for you:  http://www.remmelwellness.com/Wellness_Services.html 

Tie that in with a good nutritional program (remember my posts on vitamin D? http://blog.remmelwellness.com/wellness/vitamin-d-cures-cancer/) and diet and exercise, and watch your health improve, your disease risk factors decrease and your projected lifetime medical costs to decrease. 

Posted by Laurie Puckett, Remmel Wellness Center, a full service chiropractic and wellness facility in St. Petersburg, Florida.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]