• *These fields are required.

    Powered by Salesforce CRM
Category: Weight Loss

CONDITIONS THAT MAY BE TREATABLE BY ACUPUNCTURE ACCORDING TO W.H.O.

The World Health Organization (WHO) published an official report on four categories of symptoms, conditions and diseases that have been shown to benefit from Acupuncture. In a recent Health Report, we presented WHO’s Category #1 list – diseases, symptoms or conditions for which Acupuncture has been shown, through controlled trials, to be effective – as a guide for patients seeking treatment, and to help patients and healthcare providers seek insurance coverage by showing WHO’s official recognition of Acupuncture benefits.

The WHO report also contained three additional categories of conditions for which recognized controlled trials had not been done, but for which Acupuncture nevertheless has been shown to be helpful.

The Category #2 list includes diseases, symptoms or conditions for which the therapeutic effect of Acupuncture has been demonstrated but for which further proof is needed.

Here is the list:

Abdominal pain Acne vulgaris Alcohol dependence
Bell’s palsy Bronchial asthma Cancer pain
Cardiac neurosis Chronic cholecystitis Cholelithiasis
Competition stress syndrome Craniocerebral injury, closed Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin)
Earache Epidemic haemorrhagic fever Epistaxis, simple
Eye pain due to injection Female infertility Facial spasm
Female urethral syndrome Fibromyalgia and fasciitis Gastrokinetic disturbance
Gouty arthritis Hepatitis B virus carrier status Herpes zoster (human)
Hyperlipaemia Hypo-ovarianism Insomnia
Labor pain Lactation, deficiency Male sexual dysfunction
Ménière disease Neuralgia, post-herpetic Neurodermatitis
Obesity Opiate/opioid dependence Osteoarthritis
Endoscopic exam pain Thromboangiitis pain Polycystic ovary syndrome
Postextubation in children Postoperative convalescence Premenstrual syndrome
Prostatitis, chronic Pruritus Radicular/pseudorad pain
Raynaud syndrome, primary Recurrent urinary infection Reflex sympathetic dystrophy
Retention of urine, traumatic Schizophrenia Sialism, drug-induced
Sjögren syndrome Sore throat (and tonsillitis) Acute spine pain
Stiff neck Temporomandibular pain Tietze syndrome
Tobacco dependence Tourette syndrome Ulcerative colitis, chronic
Urolithiasis Vascular dementia Whooping cough (pertussis)

If you or someone you know is having trouble with any of the above conditions, check with your acupuncturist to see if they can help.

 

Aspartame is it good or bad for you?

NutraSweet
Image via Wikipedia

Aspartame pronounced /ˈæspərteɪm/ or /əˈspɑrteɪm/) is the technical name for many of the artificial sweeteners (NutraSweet®, Equal® etc.). It was first approved by the FDA in 1981, over the objections of neuroscience researcher, Dr. John W. Olney and Consumer Attorney James Turner.

Aspartame consists of:

• 50% Phenylalanine

• 40% Aspartic Acid

• 10% Methyl Alcohol (Methyl alcohol is a toxic, colorless, flammable liquid.)

Excess aspartic acid in our food supply has been proven to cause serious chronic neurological disorders. Phenylalanine is an amino acid normally found in the brain. It has been shown that ingesting aspartame, especially along with carbohydrates, can lead to excess levels of phenylalanine in the brain, leading to emotional disorders, including schizophrenia, and can also lead to seizures.

Methanol is wood alcohol and is a deadly poison. It breaks down in the body into formic acid and formaldehyde, another deadly neurotoxin.

Aspartame is by far the most dangerous food additive on the market and accounts for over 75% of the adverse reactions to food additives reported to the FDA. The Food and Drug Administration reported 5,064 Aspartame related health complaints. There are 90 documented symptoms associated with the consumption of this product. Among them are headaches, dizziness, seizures, irritability, heart palpitations, breathing difficulties, vision problems, memory loss and hyperactivity.

According to researchers and physicians, the following illnesses can be worsened or triggered by using this product: Brain tumors, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, chronic fatigue syndrome, mental retardation and diabetes, to name but a few.

A new movie entitled “Sweet Misery” chronicles the medical horrors of Aspartame. The film makes claims that aspartame may produce an MS-like syndrome as well as Parkinson’s symptoms (shaking, etc.)

Aspartame and MSG are amongst the excitotoxins that are responsible for damaging nerve fibers. Research has shown that excessive exposure to excitotoxins damages nerve fibers by killing the cells that are responsible for producing the sheath-like covering that protects the nerves.

When aspartame is consumed it causes the excitotoxin level in the blood to elevate significantly.
When Aspartame is consumed alongside MSG, excitotoxin levels soar and result in significant damage to the nerve fibers, which contribute to producing MS and Parkinson’s symptoms.

When people with benign MS consume Aspartame, it can convert the syndrome into full-blown MS, as Aspartame contains the toxin Methanol. If these persons consume additional excitotoxins, the risk of further disability and even death is greatly magnified.

Recent studies have also shown that even a SINGLE EXPOSURE to these food-based excitotoxins can produce prolonged worsening of neurological lesions; liquid forms of excitotoxins were found to be significantly more toxic due to the rapid absorption and higher blood levels.

If it is so dangerous, why is aspartame approved as an edible substance by the FDA? The answer is actually very simple. All of these symptoms are slow in development and they all could be due to many other causes. In other words, it is extremely hard and almost clinically impossible to diagnose any of these symptoms as being caused by aspartame. This is especially true since there is no immediate reaction after its consumption.

And, more than likely, the negative effects of aspartame occur after long term consumption of up to many years making it even more difficult to pin it as the culprit.

The reality, though, is that our society is taking daily doses of this substance over long periods of time. Unfortunately, there are no long term studies on the use of aspartame to help clarify the matter. It makes sense to err on the side of caution when it comes to using aspartame. Real or not, the potential consequences for the long-term use of this sweetener are scary.

The decision you need to make is not whether aspartame is good or bad for you. The decision is whether you will continue to subject you body to what could be called a toxin. Since you do not experience symptoms immediately from the consumption of this product, a good number of you will continue to use aspartame. This falls under the same reasoning as to why people continue to smoke. These are some very interesting facts to consider when deciding whether you feel that aspartame does or does not pose a health risk.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Did McDonald’s Force-Feed This Guy??

A Big Mac combo meal with French fries and Coc...
Image via Wikipedia

Americans have exported our particular breed of insanity.  Now, not only can you find America’s fast food restaraunts on every single continent, with the exception of Antartica, but the obesity caused by the unhealthy foods that make up the bulk of their menu items is also spreading.  Even worse, people in other parts of the world no longer seem to be able to think for themselves when it comes to the foods they choose to eat.  So I ask you, is it really McDonald’s fault that this guy ate at McDonald’s every single day for 12 or so years?  And did they MAKE him chose the Big Mac and supersize his fries???

This is a real story:  A Brazilian court ruled this week that McDonald’s must pay a former franchise manager $17,500 because he gained 65 pounds while working there for a dozen years.

The 32-year-old man said he felt forced to sample the food each day to ensure quality standards remained high, because McDonald’s hired “mystery clients” to randomly visit restaurants and report on the food, service and cleanliness.  I’m sorry, but in my book, “sampling” means a taste, not eating the entire thing (although, admittedly, it is all but impossible to eat just one french fry)!!

The man also said the company offered free lunches to employees, adding to his caloric intake while on the job. His identity was not released.  I’d keep my identity a secret too if I were so weak-willed as to offer the excuse “it was free, so I HAD to eat it!”

The ruling was signed Tuesday by Judge Joao Ghisleni Filho in Porto Alegre.

Ghisleni said McDonald’s could appeal the case, and the Brazilian headquarters of the chain said in an e-mailed statement Thursday it was weighing its legal options.

McDonald’s also noted that it offers healthier food choices.

“The chain offers a large variety of options and balanced menus to cater (to) the daily dietary needs of its employees,” the company said in the statement.

I have long advocated for Americans accepting responsibility for their actions … which includes taking responsibility for the food you choose to eat, the beverages you choose to drink and the level of activity you choose to engage in.  If you are obese, you have no one but yourself to blame.  No where in this story did it say McDonald’s put a gun to this guy’s head and made him eat the food! 

If you are tired of being overweight or obese and are ready to become responsible for your actions, Remmel Wellness Center can help you with a medically supervised weight loss program, fun and effective exercise programs and counseling to deal with your food choice issues.  Now is YOUR time to take conrol!

Posted by Laurie Puckett at Remmel Wellness Center, a full service wellness and chiropractic facilty located in beautiful St. Petersburg, Florida.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Quit making Excuses for Being Fat!!

These children, playing in a public space, var...
Image via Wikipedia

This type of reporting really makes me mad.  I am sick and tired of people to make excuses for everything.  Nothing is ever their fault.  They are completely blameless for what ever has gone wrong in their life.  WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!!  You are killing yourself … but of course it is not YOUR fault, it is?

This is the article posted on the Bay News 9 website.  I didn’t find the story picked up in any other media outlet, so the story itself seems to be a little suspect.:

“Does it seem like you just can’t lose weight, no matter what you do?

New research shows that obesity may have nothing to do with your lifestyle.

Exercise and eating healthier has always been recommended for weight loss, and obesity is no light matter.

In fact, it’s one of the largest medical problems in America.

But now, scientists at Yale University say your waistline could be just as easy to control as your eye color or nose shape.

In their study, rats were bred to actually be predisposed to obesity.

According to researchers, in those animals, neurons that are supposed to raise the flag that they were full after eating functioned much more slowly.

They also found those more prone to diet-caused obesity developed brain inflammation.

The resistant rats did not.

That could explain why two different people with the same unhealthy eating habits end up with different results, but researchers say genetics alone is not the primary source of obesity development.”  http://www.baynews9.com/article/news/2010/october/166512/Are-we-born-to-be-fat-or-skinny–Research-says-yes?cid=rss
News reports like this encourage people to not accept responsibility for their own actions – in this case the food they choose to eat and their level of inactivity.  I work in a wellness facility that has a medical weight loss program, and EVERYBODY who has stayed with the program has lost weight.  Furthermore, EVERYBODY who successfully lost weight has kept it off by taking the necessary steps to CHANGE their lifestyle. 

This reports discourages people from actually making the changes they need to make to lose weight and become healthy.  It’s just one more excuse in a long line of excuses people offer for their weight problems.  Wake up America and accept responsibility for the fact that your actions and inactions are the reason you are overweight, and stop blaming it on genetics and anything else that is convenient and easy.

To get the help you need to lose weight, call Remmel Wellness Center at 727-525-1141 to schedule your consultation today.  Remmel Wellness Center incorporates a doctor supervised high protein meal replacement plan with excercise and counseling to help you lose weight and keep it off.  It is not impossible … you CAN do it!!!

Posted by Laurie Puckett, Remmel Wellness Center, a full service wellness and chiropractic facility located in beautiful St. Petersburg, Florida.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Would you like pills with your burger?

LOS ANGELES, CA - JULY 24:  A signs for Jack I...
Image by Getty Images via @daylife

Drugs, drugs, drugs … if some people have their way, you will be getting prescription drugs along with your fast food.  Is anybody else outraged by this idea?  I’m not kidding ~ there really are doctors that are proposing putting statin drugs in little packets, kind of like catsup packages, at fast food restaurants.

(NaturalNews) What do you get when you combine fast food with Big Pharma? Pharmaburger! That’s the name of episode one of the new “Food Investigations” mini-documentary series created by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, editor of NaturalNews.com.

Food Investigations (www.FoodInvestigations.com) features short documentary videos (under 10 minutes each) exposing little-known facts about fast food and processed food products. The videos are free to watch at the website, and they’re also available at www.NaturalNews.TV where thousands of other holistic health videos can be viewed for free every day.

The Pharmaburger mini-documentary takes issue with the doctor from Imperial College London whose study, published in the American Journal of Cardiology, led him to recommend that statin drugs be handed out like ketchup packets at fast food restaurants. This, he claims, would “counteract” the heart risk dangers of fast foods.

Just pop a pill every time you chow down a junk food cheeseburger, in other words, and the health risks will be cancelled out. It’s a juvenile, short-sighted point of view about health and nutrition, of course, but the idea has a surprisingly large number of followers among practitioners of mainstream medicine (many of which are arguably illiterate when it comes to nutrition in the first place).

Ultimately, the idea seeks to turn fast food restaurants into pharmacies, lining up gullible customers to be dosed with powerful prescription pharmaceuticals based on no diagnosis, no doctor visits, and absolutely no consideration of their current health condition or possible drug interactions. To call it “medicine” is an insult to the very definition of the word.

The sad truth of the matter is that some members of the medication profession want to intoxicate everyone with dangerous chemical medications, and they are hoping to use fast food restaurants to achieve that goal. This Pharmaburger mini-documentary tells the rest of this story which will surprise most viewers.

At the end of the day, individuals need to start taking responsibility for themselves and their health.  Popping a pill isn’t going to fix things.  When you are ready to take responsibility, call Remmel Wellness Center to schedule an appointment and help yourself get healthy. 

Posted by Laurie Puckett at Remmel Wellness Center, a full service wellness and chiropractic center located in beautiful St. Petersburg, Florida.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Cold virus makes kids fat … Really??

Original caption: Not faked. I was trying to t...
Image via Wikipedia

Who are you trying to kid?  When I saw this article written NaturalNews.com, I just knew I had to share it will all of you.  The story is too fantastic, in a very sad sort of way, to just ignore: 

The headlines have it all backwards. “Childhood Obesity Might Be Linked to Strain of Cold Virus” says BusinessWeek. “Childhood cold virus could lead to development of obesity” claims the Telegraph (UK). Not to be outdone, MSNBC rolls out this whopper: “Nothing to sneeze at: Common cold virus may make kids fat.”   To take a line from Seth and Amy on SNL … “Really??”

What are all these headlines referring to? A new study out of the University of California, San Diego, revealed that obese children were far more likely to have been infected with adenovirus 36 (AD36) than fit children. This is what’s called an “observational correlation” in scientific terms.

From this observational correlation, the scientists involved in the study as well as virtually the entire mainstream media leaped to the false conclusion that the virus must be causing obesity. It’s sort of like saying that pregnancy causes sex. They have it all backwards.

Here’s why:

Being obese (which is caused almost entirely by food and exercise choices) makes you more susceptible to infections because it impairs immune function. So obese kids are more likely to be infected with AD36 right from the start. Furthermore, obese kids are far more likely to have reduced time outside playing in the sun, so they’re more likely to be vitamin D deficient, making them even more susceptible to infection.

They’re also more likely to be living on junk foods rather than healthful foods, contributing both to obesity and poor immune defenses. All this adds up to the real cause of their infections: Poor health and poor immune function.

That’s why obese children have a high correlation with AD36 viral infections. They have a common cause: An unhealthful lifestyle that attracts both infections and obesity.

The hidden vaccine agenda
Laughably, the so-called “scientific” medical community can only see this issue in one way: The virus must have caused the obesity! This reversal of cause and effect coincidentally happens to support — guess what? A vaccine agenda against AD36. If they can convinced everyone that AD36 causes obesity, they can roll out an “obesity vaccine” and claim that taking the vaccine stops you from getting fat. (It’s the same scam currently being pushed for HPV vaccines.)

It’s another vaccine victory for an industry that wants us all to believe viruses determine most of the health outcomes in our lives and that our own actions have no role in our own health. That’s the message in this warped virus-obesity story, of course: Your kids can’t control their body weight through eating and exercise, it’s all about the virus! So pay no attention to their food. It doesn’t matter.

Nonsense. And the mainstream media reports on this science are just blatantly false. “Children who are exposed to a cold-like virus when young are more likely to develop obesity, scientists have claimed” says the Telegraph article. That’s utterly false, and it doesn’t even follow from the research — which only established a correlation, not a causative role. The Telegraph has inserted its own cause-effect time flow into the facts of the study, assuming a causal link between the virus and obesity.

In reality, no such causal link exists. The study merely found a correlation, and when you find correlations, you can’t leap to a conclusion that B causes A. Because maybe you’ve got it wrong and A causes B.

Stuck in the germ theory era
But why does mainstream medicine and the mainstream media automatically leap to the false conclusion that a virus causes obesity? Because that’s the way they think. They’re stuck in the germ theory of disease where they mistakenly believe an invading germ or microorganism is responsible for patient health. They discount the role of the patients’ own actions in their health outcome and thereby steal away power from patients and place it in the hands of the drug companies — the organizations responsible for coming up with “miracle chemical cures” to these infectious viruses.

This idea is strongly reflected in a statement from study leader Dr Jeffrey Schwimmer who said, “It is time that we moved away from assigning blame in favor of developing a level of understanding that will better support efforts at both prevention and treatment.”

So let’s translate this statement from the study author, shall we? What he’s essentially saying is “Stop blaming people for their own behavior because food choice and exercise has nothing to do with obesity, and instead we need to be vaccinating children against obesity while calling it ‘treatment.’”

Notice, too, that as long as people believe their obesity problems are caused by viruses, then they can play out the “victim” role which is exactly what Big Medicine wants. Keep eating those cheeseburgers and junk foods while blaming it on a virus. Don’t bother with exercise or taking care of yourself, and if anybody asks, just tell them “the virus made me fat.”

It sounds ridiculous, doesn’t it? Yet that is precisely what MSNBC, BusinessWeek, the Telegraph and countless other newspapers are publishing this very minute! A virus makes you fat, and it doesn’t matter what you eat.

I find it astonishing that so many large and powerful media outlets can’t seem to hire writers who bother to think before they write.

Really??? Really.   And, when you are ready to stop playing the blame game and are willing to take responsibility for your health, come to Remmel Wellness Center where we combine a number of treatments and therapies with education to help you lose weight, get healthy and stay that way.

Posted by Laurie Puckett at Remmel Wellness Center, a full service wellness and chiropractic center located in beautiful St. Petersburg, Florida.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Rising Obesity and Rising Costs

Silhouettes and waist circumferences represent...
Image via Wikipedia

Do you want to hear something really scary?  In 10 years, a full 75 percent of Americans will be overweight, making it the fattest country in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 

Citizens of the world’s richest countries are getting fatter and fatter and the United States is leading the charge, an organization of leading economies said Thursday in its first ever obesity forecast.

“Food is much cheaper than in the past, in particular food that is not particularly healthy, and people are changing their lifestyles, they have less time to prepare meals and are eating out more in restaurants,” said Sassi, a former London School of Economics lecturer who worked on the report for three years.

That plus the fact that people are much less physically active than in the past means that the ranks of the overweight  have swelled to 67 percent in the U.S. this year from well under 50 percent in 1980, according to the OECD.

 This means that disease rates and health care spending will balloon, unless governments, individuals and industry cooperate on a comprehensive strategy to combat the epidemic. 

So, what are the costs associated with obesity?  Higher medical bills are the most obvious cost, but that’s only a portion of the real-life costs.

George Washington University researchers added in things like employee sick days, lost productivity, even the need for extra gasoline, and found the annual cost of being obese is $4,879 for a woman and $2,646 for a man.

That’s far more than the cost of being merely overweight, $524 for women and $432 for men, concluded the report being released Tuesday, which analyzed previously published studies to come up with a total.

Why the difference between the sexes? Studies suggest larger women earn less than skinnier women, while wages don’t differ when men pack on the pounds. That was a big surprise, said study co-author and health policy professor Christine Ferguson.

Researchers had expected everybody’s wages to suffer with obesity, but “this indicates you’re not that disadvantaged as a guy, from a wage perspective,” said Ferguson, who plans to study why.

Then consider that obesity is linked to earlier death. While that’s not something people usually consider a pocketbook issue, the report did average in the economic value of lost life. That brought women’s annual obesity costs up to $8,365, and men’s to $6,518.

A major study published last year found medical spending averages $1,400 more a year for the obese than normal-weight people. Tuesday’s report added mostly work-related costs, things like sick days and disability claims, related to those health problems.

It also included an unusual finding, a study that calculated nearly 1 billion additional gallons of gasoline are used every year because of increases in car passengers’ weight since 1960.

And the thing is, nobody is doing anything to stop this trend.  Americans have a lazy, herd of sheep mentality and will continue to eat unhealthily, will continue to sit in front of the television or computer or video game rather than exercise, and will continue to think it is acceptable to take pill to counteract their poor choices.

I’ve said it before and I will say it again …  we don’t have a healthcare crisis in America, we have a culture crisis. It is time to change the way we think, act and behave. Taking a pill isn’t going to make everything all better. There are ways to get healthy and lose weight, and we can help, but you have to make a decision… and the decision that needs to be made is to be an active participant in your health.  When you have made that decision, call us at Remmel Wellness Center and find out just how healthy you can be when you take responsibility for your health.

Posted by Laurie Puckett at Remmel Wellness Center, a full service wellness and chiropractic center located in beautiful St. Petersburg, Florida.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Misleading Claims that Food Manufacturers Make

Example of an American grocery store aisle.
Image via Wikipedia

In my crusade to educate and inform Americans on the foods they are eating so that we can all make educated and informed choices when we shop, I came across a great article in Scientific American that really blasts the claims that food manufactures make on their labels.  These claims are misleading marketing ploys to sell more product by convincing the purchaser that the food is “good for them.”  The reality is that the claims have very little to no proof to back them up, and a consumer who is relying on these claims to improve their health may be doing more harm to themselves than good.

Read this article that was printed in the September 20, 2010 issue of Scientific American:

From cereals that boost immunity to yogurts that regulate digestion and juices that keep heart disease at bay, grocery stores in the U.S. are brimming with packaged foods and beverages that claim to improve health. Such declarations are good for business: sales of “functional foods”—those that manufacturers have modified to provide supposed health benefits—generated $31 billion in the U.S. in 2008, a 14 percent increase over 2006, according to Rockville, Md.–based market research firm Packaged Facts. But consumers are getting a rotten deal. Although health claims for foods may appear to be authoritative, in many cases science does not support them and the government does not endorse them. Not only do these products, many of which are nutritionally bereft, fail to deliver on their promises, but they may also give consumers a false sense of security that discourages them from taking more effective measures to attain wellness, such as exercise or medication.

In March the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued warning letters to 17 food and beverage manufacturers concerning false or misleading health and nutrition claims on their products. It was an unusually expansive crackdown for the agency, whose regulatory power over food companies has declined over the past decades, thanks to Congress and the courts, which have tended to come down on the side of the food companies. The FDA’s move, accompanied by an open letter from Commissioner Margaret Hamburg about the importance of accurate nutrition labeling, was a significant step toward halting the exploitation of science by food marketers, but it does not go far enough in protecting consumers from deceptive marketing.

The FDA currently issues guide­lines for what claims companies can make about their foods. It allows statements about how products affect the normal structure and function of the body but prohibits unauthorized claims about disease. The agency, though, does not review compliance before food is packaged and shipped. Food products arrive at the stores emblazoned with questionable claims. Cheerios can lower cholesterol 4 percent in six weeks, asserted the box label, until the FDA sent General Mills a cease-and-desist letter in May 2009. Redco Foods’s Salada Naturally Decaffeinated Green Tea promised to tackle Alzheimer’s, rheumatism and cancer, until the March crackdown. The agency is then forced to play catch-up. Meanwhile the snake oil sits on supermarket shelves.

Holding health claims for food to the same scientific standards as those for drugs—and requiring manufacturers to convince the FDA of alleged benefits before releasing products for sale—would result in far fewer health claims on packaged foods, if recent developments in Europe are any indication. In 2006 Europe began holding food makers to rigorous scientific standards. Since then, the European Food Safety Authority has rejected, on the basis of insufficient evidence, a whopping 80 percent of the more than 900 claims they have assessed thus far. Among the rejects were claims about probiotic ingredients, which are commonly found in yogurt products and often touted for their alleged digestive benefits, and omega-3 fatty acids, which are frequently added to products ranging from orange juice to baby food and are often said to promote brain development. The simple act of asking for evidence is sometimes enough to reveal the shoddiness of a claim—some European firms drew supporting materials from Wikipedia, the American Heritage dictionary and the Bible.

Differences between the lenient U.S. system and the more restrictive European system are easily apparent. For instance, visitors to the Web site for Activia (www.activia.com)—a yogurt product from Dannon—will have a very different experience depending on which country they indicate they are from. The U.S. version prominently displays the product’s putative health benefits, asserting that it can “help regulate your digestive system by helping reduce long intestinal transit time.” (It does not say explicitly that the yogurt helps to alleviate constipation, which would be a clear violation of the FDA prohibition of unauthorized claims about specific medical conditions.) The U.K. version, on the other hand, says only that the yogurt contains an exclusive bacterial culture and, like other yogurts, is a source of calcium and vitamin B12.

Industry representatives complain that having to prove claims about the health benefits of food would cost too much and take too long. It’s a lame argument. The nation is currently engaged in a struggle against skyrocketing rates of obesity and other diet-related diseases that are among the leading causes of death in the U.S. In this context, unsubstantiated health claims on processed foods are a harmful abuse of science that we should not tolerate.

****

If you are unsure about some of the claims being made, or are overwhelmed by the choices presented to you when you walk into your supermarket, search out a nutritionist or other professional who does grocery store tours.  These tours help you shop smarter and healthier.  Remmel Wellness Center is part of the Holistic Health Network, which is organizing grocery store tours in Pinellas County.  You can contact us for dates and locations of these tours.

Posted by Laurie Puckett at Remmel Wellness Center, a full service wellness and chiropractic facility located in beautiful St. Petersburg, Florida.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Problem with Zapping Fat

Open your eyes and you see it everywhere … body fat.  With the percentage of Americans who are overweight or obese exceeding 60%, you know exactly what I am talking about.  I have fat, and odds are, you have fat, too.  I really don’t think anyone likes being fat, and most people who are overweight or have excess fat in the wrong place want to get rid of it.

We are a society that wants the quick fix – diet pills, surgery … and now, two non-surgical, non-diet devices—one that deflates fat cells, one that destroys them—have been cleared for “body contouring” in doctors’ offices by the Food and Drug Administration.  The following story comes from the Wall Street Journal:

Zeltiq grabs onto love handles and belly pouches and freezes the fat cells inside, causing them to self-destruct over several months. Zerona is a low-level laser that rotates around the waist, hips and thighs, forcing the fat cells to empty in a matter of weeks. In both cases, there are no incisions, no downtime and no need for anesthesia. The fat is reabsorbed by the body.

Several other devices that claim to painlessly blast away fat with ultrasound, radio waves or lasers are already on the market or hoping for FDA approval soon. These high-tech weapons in the battle of the bulge are less invasive than liposuction—which involves loosening fat internally and vacuuming it out with a tube, a procedure that nearly 200,000 Americans had last year.

Of course, there is still no magic wand for the 66% of us who are overweight or obese: Eliminating fat cells without also eating less or exercising more may make fat crop up elsewhere and ultimately do more harm than good.

That’s because fat cells are not just passive storage depots for surplus calories. They are busy chemical factories that send signals all over the body, helping to regulate growth, puberty, healing, disease-fighting and aging. Among the 100 or more hormones that fat cells secrete are adiponectine, which helps manage metabolism, and leptin, which tells the brain to eat more or less (although the brain doesn’t always listen).

Much about fat cells remains mysterious. They’re among the largest and longest-living cells in the body, capable of expanding at least 64 times their original size (the upper limit is unknown). A lean adult has about 40 billion fat cells; an obese adult can have 120 billion.

In general, it’s healthier to have a larger number of small fat cells than fewer, fatter ones. Subcutaneous fat cells, under the skin in places like the hips, thighs and lower belly, may be unsightly, but they are relatively benign.

Their principal work is to pull excess fat out of the bloodstream, package it and store it in big droplets—one per fat cell—until the body needs it for energy.

Healthy fat cells are precisely attuned to the body’s needs, says Michael D. Jensen, an endocrinologist at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. “When you eat too much, the fat cells store it up, and when you miss a meal, they give it back to you.”

But if fat cells aren’t working properly, they don’t store and release fat effectively. Harmful versions called visceral fat cells accumulate in and around organs like the heart and liver, and release fat into the bloodstream, raising the risk for heart disease, diabetes, stroke and Alzheimer’s disease.

Why some fat cells stop working, and why some proliferate while others just balloon isn’t understood.

Heredity clearly plays a role, as does taking in more calories than the body needs. But fat-cell function doesn’t necessarily correlate with weight gain. Some people are able to carry 100 extra pounds and still have functioning fat cells; others run into metabolic trouble when they gain just a few pounds, according to Dr. Jensen.

Until recently, experts thought that all the body’s fat cells were created by around age 20, and that they never died, just grew and shrunk as people gained or lost weight. But scientists at Sweden’s Karolinska Institute recently discovered that even in lean people, about 10% of the body’s fat cells die and are replaced each year.

“The fact that the number seems to remain constant over the years indicates that something is very much regulating the number of fat cells. That’s what I’m interested in right now,” says neuroscientist Kirsty Spalding, the lead researcher.

The amount and distribution of fat also changes naturally with age. “People tend to gain subcutaneous fat through middle age, and then it starts to diminish, first on the back of the hands, then in the lower legs and elsewhere,” says James L. Kirkland, a professor of aging at the Mayo Clinic. It piles up as visceral fat instead—and eventually appears in muscle, liver and even bone marrow, where the fat is a substitute for new bones. “Losing subcutaneous fat is not good, paradoxically,” Dr. Kirkland says.

That’s partly why some obesity experts are wary of the new fat-blasting techniques. The devices can’t target visceral fat, only subcutaneous fat, and if patients continue to consume more calories than they burn, they may hasten that process of accumulating harmful fat instead.

Some experts also worry that forcing fat out of fat cells can increase the level in the bloodstream.

“Fat is very toxic,” says Dr. Jensen. “It’s not something you want in large amounts floating around free. You want it inside a cell, protected.”

Another danger is that losing fat cells could will lower leptin levels, signaling to the brain to eat more.

“That’s one of the reasons it’s so, so hard to maintain weight loss—the body is trying to defend a weight it got used to,” says Mitchell Lazar, director of the Institute for Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism at the University of Pennsylvania.

*****  The best, most effective way to lose weight is to change the way you eat and how much activity you do.  For people who want a fast change, weight loss programs like Ideal Protein provide a healthy, physician supervised way to drop the pounds.  When you lose weight using the right foods and exercise, you will actually lower the amount of fat in your blood stream (unlike some of the non-surgical, cosmetic alternatives), and lower your cholesterol, your blood pressure and get your pancreas to produce insulin naturally.  A good, reputable clinic, like Remmel Wellness Center, will also provide education, information, coaching and counseling to help you make lifestyle changes so that you are able to keep the weight off.  Call 727-525-1141 to find out if Ideal Protein is right for you.

Posted by Laurie Puckett at Remmel Wellness Center, a full service wellness and chiropractic facility located in beautiful St. Petersburg, Florida.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Still No Magic Pill for Weight Loss

Apple.
Image via Wikipedia

There is no quick fix or magic pill that will help you lose weight.  Losing weight takes dedication.  Keeping the weight off takes even more dedication - to a lifestyle change. 

Once again, pharmaceutical manufacturers are seeking to develop a diet pill that will help people lose weight without killing them.  If they succeed, they will be rich beyond even their wildest dreams, but they haven’t succeeded yet.

Federal health officials say weight loss with a new diet drug from Arena Pharmaceuticals was minimal and safety questions remain about its effects on the heart.

Arena Pharmaceuticals has asked the Food and Drug Administration to approve its drug lorcaserin for obese and overweight patients. If approved the pill would be the first new prescription diet pill in a dozen years. However, in a review posted online, the FDA says weight loss with the drug was “relatively low” and questions whether the drug might cause heart valve-disease _ a side effect seen with older diet pills.

On Wednesday the FDA will ask a panel of experts to assess lorcaserin’s safety. The agency is not required to follow the panel’s advice, although it often does.

If you really want to lose weight, call us at Remmel Wellness Center.  We will work with you to lose the weight in a quick, healthy way using Ideal Protein.  We will also help you keep the weight off when you meet your goals by education, counseling to address reasons for poor food choices, and/or with hypnosis.  Call to schedule an appointment to see how you can change your life in a healthy, natural way.

Posted by Laurie Puckett at Remmel Wellness Center, a full service wellness and chiropractic center located in beautiful St. Petersburg, Florida. 

Enhanced by Zemanta